Website Stats · Original research
Mole Catchers Website Statistics 2026
We ran automated homepage audits on 5 UK mole catchers websites — checking page speed, mobile UX, on-page SEO, structured data, contact conversion and more. Here's what we found.
Avg score
53/100
Avg page speed
1037ms
Sites analysed
5
Score distribution
Good (80–100)0 sites (0%)
Okay (60–79)1 sites (20%)
Poor (0–59)4 sites (80%)
How many pass the basics
HTTPS enabled100%
Mobile viewport100%
Structured data (schema)80%
Contact form on homepage40%
Open Graph share image40%
Analytics installed60%
Most common mistakes
- No theme-color meta — plain browser chrome on mobile100% of sites
- N inline style attributes — no consistent design system80% of sites
- No Open Graph image — links look blank on WhatsApp/Facebook60% of sites
- No contact form found on homepage60% of sites
- Footer copyright says N — looks abandoned60% of sites
- Homepage HTML is NKB — heavy40% of sites
- Page title too long (N chars — Google truncates)40% of sites
- No analytics detected — flying blind on visitor data40% of sites
- No external CSS stylesheet — likely unstyled or WYSIWYG outp40% of sites
- No HN heading40% of sites
How does your site compare?
Get a free audit and see where you sit versus the mole catchers average.
Methodology: automated homepage audits by RIOT Studio, July 2026.